![](http://theinvestingbox.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Getty-thinking-questions-uncertain-guess-future-4.jpg)
Fundsmith Equity remains one of the most popular funds among investors and it’s not hard to see why. It has a straightforward, nonsense-free approach — espoused by manager Terry Smith — coupled with excellent returns to date. I’ve been a holder for years.
So would it be fair to suggest this is as close to a no-brainer buy as anyone is likely to find? And would I buy more today?
Fundsmith delivers
Well, the numbers speak for themselves. From inception in November 2010 to the end of last month, Fundsmith delivered a spectacular return of just under 533%.
By comparison, its benchmark — the MSCI World Index — climbed by almost 300% over the same period. The FTSE 100? Just 30% or so, excluding dividends. Yikes!
Cash has fared even worse, up by a little over 10%. Granted, historically-low interest rates for most of those 13 years haven’t helped. Still, this is further evidence that sticking money in a bank account (beyond an emergency fund) probably won’t do me any favours in the long run.
Based on this, it’s a tough ask to criticise Smith’s strategy of buying great companies, not over-paying, and then doing nothing.
For balance, let’s try.
Lucky timing?
It could be argued that Fundsmith was simply in the right space at the right time. Setting up shop not long after the Financial Crisis and enjoying a near-decade-long bull market was never going to hurt.
Indeed, the fact that the fund drastically underperformed its benchmark last year shows that Fundsmith is not immune to setbacks.
This trend has continued in 2023 so far. Alarmingly, a far better return could have been achieved by buying a bog standard S&P 500 tracker that also charges much lower fees. That index is up 17% year-to-date.
Concentration risk
Speaking of the US, a second concern is that two-thirds of Fundsmith’s portfolio is invested across the pond. Since that rise in the S&P 500 appears based more on sentiment rather than actual earnings (and Fundsmith holds just 26 stocks), perhaps the risk profile of the fund is higher than it initially appears.
If the US market were to crash, Fundsmith might do better than the S&P 500 tracker but it wouldn’t get away unscathed.
All this is why I continue to believe that a degree of diversification is vital in every portfolio.
If we’re going to nit-pick, Smith also openly acknowledged that he was (very) slow to buy tech titans like Amazon and Apple. Clearly, these would have juiced Fundsmith’s returns even more.
Is there a risk of this happening again as the market salivates over themes like artificial intelligence, electric cars and renewable energy?
Quality rules OK
I’m not sure I’d ever go so far as to say any stock or fund is a no-brainer buy. Every potential investment must be judged according to individual financial goals and tolerance for risk.
That aside, I continue to regard Fundsmith as a core holding within my portfolio. That 13-year return simply can’t be ignored.
True, the past may not be a guide to the future. To jettison evidence that companies exhibiting quality characteristics are able to massively compound wealth over the long term (think decades, not years) however, would be a mistake.
Recent underperformance aside, I’ll be adding to my holding when I have the money to do so.
The post Is Fundsmith a no-brainer buy? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.
Don’t miss this top growth pick for the ‘cost of living crisis’
While the media raves about Google and Amazon, this lesser-known stock has quietly grown 880% – with a:
- Greater than 20X increase in margins
- Nearly 60% compounded revenue growth over 5 years – more than Apple, Amazon and Google!
- A 3,000% earnings explosion
Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future results. However, we think it’s stronger now than ever before. Amazingly, you may never have heard of this company.
Yet there’s a 1-in-3 chance you’ve used one of its 250 brands. Many are household names with millions of monthly website visitors, and that often help consumers compare items, shop around and save.
Now, as the ‘cost of living crisis’ bites, we believe its influence could soar. And that might bring imminent new gains to investors who’re in position today. So please, don’t leave without your FREE report, ‘One Top Growth Stock from The Motley Fool’.
Claim your FREE copy now
setButtonColorDefaults(“#5FA85D”, ‘background’, ‘#5FA85D’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#43A24A”, ‘border-color’, ‘#43A24A’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#FFFFFF”, ‘color’, ‘#FFFFFF’);
})()
More reading
- Are Rolls-Royce shares now too expensive to buy at 208p?
- 1 no-brainer reason to buy Scottish Mortgage shares
- If I’d invested £1k in this FTSE 100 gem 20 years ago I’d be up 14 times
- Warren Buffett owns these 2 stocks. I’d buy them today
- How these 2 LSE stocks could make me a second income of £1,780!
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Paul Summers owns shares in Fundsmith Equity Fund. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Amazon.com and Apple. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.